<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.5 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:17:07 GMT--><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rss="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"><rss:channel rdf:about="http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/"><rss:title>Copyleft Currents</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/</rss:link><rss:description></rss:description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><dc:date>2010-07-30T13:17:07Z</dc:date><admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.squarespace.com/">Squarespace Site Server v5.11.5 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</admin:generatorAgent><rss:items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/7/23/linking-document.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/7/22/lobbying-effort-favors-open-source-in-eu-government-procurem.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/7/7/mozilla-submits-iphone-app.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/7/7/mozilla-2010-summit-promises-a-new-world-of-whizbang-browser.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/6/28/dc-plans-vote-by-mail-pilot-using-open-source-digital-voting.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/6/21/gnu-go-gone.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/6/4/quebec-court-requires-alternative-linux-bid.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/6/1/free-cle-webinar-how-to-create-an-enterprise-open-source-lic.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/6/1/fsf-takes-on-apple.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/5/12/yahoos-open-source-cloud.html"/></rdf:Seq></rss:items></rss:channel><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/7/23/linking-document.html"><rss:title>Linking Document</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/7/23/linking-document.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Heather Meeker</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-07-23T14:18:38Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="https://wiki.fsfe.org/EuropeanLegalNetwork/LinkingDocument">European Legal Network has released</a> a document addressing what kind of software interactions create derivative works -- primarily relevant to the interpretation of the General Public License.&nbsp; "The aim of this document is to provide some general guidance to lawyers  and developers working with free software to understand the technical  and (potentially) legal effects of the interaction or interoperation of  two programs together."&nbsp; The document was created by a Special Interest Group made up of  delegates from the European Legal Network, which is "a neutral, private network of legal  professionals   facilitated by  FSFE."</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/7/22/lobbying-effort-favors-open-source-in-eu-government-procurem.html"><rss:title>Lobbying Effort Favors Open Source in EU Government Procurement</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/7/22/lobbying-effort-favors-open-source-in-eu-government-procurem.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Heather Meeker</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-07-22T22:18:34Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent story in the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/19/technology/19iht-eusoftwar19.html">New York Times</a> discusses the lobbying efforts of Open Forum Europe.&nbsp; The lobbying effort focuses on the issuance of the European Interoperability Framework, which contains recommendations by the European Commission regarding the purchase of software by EU national and local governments -- which constitutes an estimated market of over $15 billion.&nbsp;&nbsp; The release of this document is scheduled by the end of 2010.&nbsp;&nbsp; Several drafts of the document are <a href="http://www.fsfe.org/projects/os/eifv2.en.html">available on FSFE's web site</a>.&nbsp; The NYT article also discusses the effect on Microsoft's effort in Europe.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/7/7/mozilla-submits-iphone-app.html"><rss:title>Mozilla Submits iPhone App</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/7/7/mozilla-submits-iphone-app.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Heather Meeker</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-07-07T19:34:58Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mozilla has submitted an iPhone App that is <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-19512_7-20006090-233.html">not Firefox, exactly, but dovetails with Firefox features</a>.&nbsp; One of the cooler features, discussed at the Summit today, was Firefox Sync, which lets Firefox users access the  history, bookmarks, and open tabs across stationary computers and mobile computing devices.&nbsp; Apple has previously <a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2010/07/08/mozilla-firefox-apple-iphone/">had a policy that effectively excluded browsers as apps</a>, but it nevertheless <a href="http://www.opera.com/press/releases/2010/04/13/">approved an Opera app</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/7/7/mozilla-2010-summit-promises-a-new-world-of-whizbang-browser.html"><rss:title>Mozilla 2010 Summit Promises a New World of Whizbang Browser Features</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/7/7/mozilla-2010-summit-promises-a-new-world-of-whizbang-browser.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Heather Meeker</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-07-07T19:29:38Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick post to say that I am at the 2010 Summit and it is very exciting to see what is on the drawing board at Mozilla -- which is metophorical of course, because it is really the drawing board of a huge community of worldwide developers.&nbsp; If you want a little bit of vicarious participation, check out the <a href="http://summit.mozilla.org/">Twitter Flickr etc. feed</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/6/28/dc-plans-vote-by-mail-pilot-using-open-source-digital-voting.html"><rss:title>DC Plans "Vote by Mail" Pilot Using Open Source Digital Voting Foundation Software</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/6/28/dc-plans-vote-by-mail-pilot-using-open-source-digital-voting.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Heather Meeker</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-06-29T02:37:28Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Washington DC will launch a test of OSDV's software, for overseas voters.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The District of Columbia&rsquo;s Board of Election and Ethics (BOEE) announced that they will adopt OSDV's TrustTheVote technology as part of a digital &ldquo;Vote by Mail&rdquo; ballot transport service pilot project for overseas ballots.&nbsp; OSDV's John Sebes blogs about it <a href="http://www.trustthevote.org/district-of-columbia-to-adopt-trustthevote-technology-for-overseas-voter-support-in-september-primary">here</a>.&nbsp;&nbsp; Sebes explains that&nbsp;the D.C. pilot is not &ldquo;online voting&rdquo; per se, but a test of an additional form of digital transport for return of blank ballots.&nbsp;&nbsp; Absentee ballots can already be obtained digitally via email or web, and returned via email or fax.&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.navytimes.com/news/2010/06/ap_dc_absenteeoninevoting_062210/">The Navy Times reports</a>, "During the November 2008 election, some 2,800 D.C. voters were sent ballots overseas, but fewer than half were actually returned and counted. Almost 300 were not counted because of problems like a voter forgetting to sign the envelope, and 36 were too late. The new system could help fix some of those problems."</p>
<p>If I may be allowed a brief editorial comment -- mindful that I have worked with OSDV as a client&nbsp;-- Yay, team!</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/6/21/gnu-go-gone.html"><rss:title>GNU GO Gone</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/6/21/gnu-go-gone.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Heather Meeker</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-06-22T00:16:10Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to say I told you so; see post of 6/1.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/27/gnu_go_fsf_apple_itunes/">GNU Go was pulled from the iPhone app store</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/6/4/quebec-court-requires-alternative-linux-bid.html"><rss:title>Quebec Court Requires Alternative Linux Bid</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/6/4/quebec-court-requires-alternative-linux-bid.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Heather Meeker</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-06-04T16:14:58Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5iThaz1W8F19aDrcs3OQYudn9EOCw">Quebec Superior court ruled</a> that a provincial agency should have solicited other altenatives before spending 720,000  Canadian dollars (686,000 US) on Microsoft software.&nbsp; This was required by the agency's own rules, which required such a process for expenditures over Canadian 25,000 dollars.&nbsp; The lawsuit was filed by Montreal-based <a href="http://www.savoirfairelinux.com/">Savoir Faire Linux</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/6/1/free-cle-webinar-how-to-create-an-enterprise-open-source-lic.html"><rss:title>Free CLE Webinar -- How to Create an Enterprise Open Source License Compliance Program</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/6/1/free-cle-webinar-how-to-create-an-enterprise-open-source-lic.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Heather Meeker</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-06-01T22:21:34Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1><span style="font-size: 80%;">Sponsored by Open Logic</span></h1>
<p>Wednesday, June 23, 2010</p>
<p>11:00am Pacific / Noon Mountain / 1:00pm Central /  2:00pm Eastern / 7:00pm GMT<br />Duration: 1 hour<br />1.0 CLE General hours pending  approval in CA and CO<br /><a href="http://go.openlogic.com/go/6974">Register for this webinar</a></p>
<p>Open source license compliance has emerged as a critical issue for businesses  seeking to take advantage of the cost and technical benefits of open source  software. Non-compliance can result in legal action, monetary damages, negative  publicity, and compromised intellectual property.</p>
<p>In this webinar sponsored by OpenLogic and Greenberg Traurig, attorney  Heather Meeker will discuss how to create an enterprise open source license  compliance program that will help you guard against potential risks. Attendees  will learn about best practices for complying with different types of open  source licenses &ndash; including GPL, permissive, and Affero-type licenses &ndash; as well  as how to maintain ongoing license compliance. Other topics to be covered in  this webinar include:</p>
<div id="standard">
<ul id="navlist">
<li style="background: url(&quot;files/bullet-black.gif&quot;) no-repeat scroll left top transparent;">The  license compliance enforcement landscape </li>
<li style="background: url(&quot;files/bullet-black.gif&quot;) no-repeat scroll left top transparent;">Infringement  vs. compliance risks </li>
<li style="background: url(&quot;files/bullet-black.gif&quot;) no-repeat scroll left top transparent;">GPL v2  vs. GPL v3 compliance concerns </li>
<li style="background: url(&quot;files/bullet-black.gif&quot;) no-repeat scroll left top transparent;">Developing a  livable open source policy </li>
<li style="background: url(&quot;files/bullet-black.gif&quot;) no-repeat scroll left top transparent;">Case  studies: how to fix license compliance problems </li>
</ul>
</div>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/6/1/fsf-takes-on-apple.html"><rss:title>FSF Takes on Apple</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/6/1/fsf-takes-on-apple.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Heather Meeker</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-06-01T20:57:03Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/why-free-software-and-apples-iphone-dont-mix">a recent blog</a> on the Free Software Foundation's web site, which describes itself as part of "<span id="parent-fieldname-description">a series of articles  detailing threats Apple's iPhone poses to free software and user  freedom," John Sullivan</span> takes issue with Apple's practices relating to iPhone app software.&nbsp; Among the complaints are "Tivoization" and possible incompatibility with the GPL.</p>
<p>The blog generally lays down a gauntlet: "The <a href="http://fsf.org/">Free Software Foundation</a> will be treating this new proprietary platform as another threat to user and developer freedom, in the same way that we  have worked to counter the threats posed by every other proprietary operating system, from <a href="http://badvista.org/">Microsoft Windows</a> in all  its forms, to Apple's OS X and other proprietary Unix variants."</p>
<p>The "Tivoization" problem is explained as follows: "In order for any program to be installed on the iPhone, the program must  be cryptographically <em>signed</em>. When a user attempts to install  software on her iPhone, the iPhone's...system checks  to see if Apple considers the signature on the software to be valid. If there  is no signature or if the signature is invalid, the iPhone will refuse to  install the software. If the software has been modified in any way, the signature  check will fail. The signature check is also tied to the user's specific  device, which means that she is not permitted to transfer or copy downloaded  programs directly between iPhones, and any other copying is permitted or not  permitted at Apple's whim."</p>
<p>Although the blog says that "Apple's approach runs headlong into...the GPL's  copyleft approach..." it stops short of claiming the iPhone store delivery system violates GPL version 2; it does state that it violates version 3.&nbsp; It states that the GPL v3 and Apple's iPhone Developer Program License Agreement "are incompatible. Apple's license says that to write  and distribute software for the iPhone, developers have to agree that any  freedom users should have to modify and share their software is secondary to the paramount requirement of observing and protecting Apple's DRM system."</p>
<p>If this is so, then GPLv3 is not an available licensing choice for iPhone apps.&nbsp; But it's unclear whether that will be a net benefit to free software.&nbsp; The most likely result is that developers will use other licenses for their apps -- a result far more likely than Apple changing its policies.&nbsp; Given the generally slow adoption of GPLv3 since its release, it's not clear that prohibiting iPhone app developers from using GPLv3 would be a win for FSF.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Of course, the issue of whether it is best for mobile apps to be available only via official sources is a broader, more interesting, and more complicated one.&nbsp; Mobile phone manufacturers want to control the content available for their phones to manage their brand (primarily by excluding offensive content), minimize security issues (primarily by excluding apps that promulgate violations of netiquette or the law), and improve user experience (primarily by excluding apps that don't work).&nbsp; But the price of a warm, comfortable user experience is accepting censorship.&nbsp; In this sense, the larger issue is yet another example of the age-old debate between freedom and safety.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/5/12/yahoos-open-source-cloud.html"><rss:title>Yahoo!'s Open Source Cloud</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.heathermeeker.com/news/2010/5/12/yahoos-open-source-cloud.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Heather Meeker</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-05-12T14:39:07Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/12/yahoo_to_open_source_cloud/">Interesting article in the Register</a> about Yahoo!'s strategy in releasing cloud computing open source software.&nbsp; My favorite line: ""We don't bless the language, We bless the container."</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item></rdf:RDF>